人类早已处在全球化的风险社会之中。如果放任“敌人意识”主导全球事务,在大国竞争、集团对抗的状态下,全球科技重大风险将无法得到遏制。西方式现代化路径存在根本缺陷,难以摆脱对大自然的掠夺以及对非西方社会的歧视性对待。中国式现代化不仅关乎中国,而且关乎世界。基于中国“和”文化构建人类命运共同体,是治理科技重大风险的必由之路,而这种“和”文化和当前中国倡导的“全人类共同价值”是相通的。中华民族伟大复兴是中国人的历史使命,而引领构建人类命运共同体、帮助治理世界性的科技重大风险,则是负责任大国的历史担当,是新时代中国人的新使命。

Humans have long been residing in a globalized risk society. If left to "enmity consciousness" to dominate global affairs, global technological major risks cannot be contained in a state of great power competition and bloc confrontation. This is because the state is the most important entity responsible for responsible innovation. If the state is irresponsible, responsible innovation will become an empty slogan. The value of Chinese culture lies in its emphasis on "harmony in diversity", which makes it more conducive to "turning enemies into friends". Constructing a community with a shared future for mankind based on Chinese "harmony" culture is the effective way to manage major technological risks, and this "harmony" culture is in line with the "common values of humanity" advocated by China today. In the context of globalization, "peaceful development" should be placed at the forefront of the common value system. The expansion of Chinese "harmony" culture and its global recognition should be achieved through "peace and development", which is also the "great power conduct" that China has always advocated. As long as China's comprehensive national strength can reach a level where it can "overcome adversaries without resorting to conflict", the awareness of a community with a shared future for mankind can be radiated globally and gain widespread recognition. The great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation is the historical mission of contemporary Chinese people, and leading the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind and helping to manage global technological major risks are the historical responsibilities of a responsible major power and the new mission of the Chinese people in the new era. Of course, to successfully advance towards a new realm of global governance for major technological risks, a systematic action plan must be put forth, and to put forth a systematic action plan, it is inseparable from profound philosophical reflection, and even more from institutional foresight.