工程专业本科生毕业要求在工程专业认证中发挥连接培养目标和课程体系的关键作用。中国工程教育专业认证协会(CEEAA)的认证标准主要是借鉴2013年版华盛顿协议(WA),该版协议于2015年制定,于2021年做了重大修订。欧洲工程教育认证网络(ENAEE)制定的本科生专业成果也有其优点。本文拟通过对比分析ENAEE的本科生专业成果、WA的毕业生属性和CEEAA的本科生毕业要求的新旧标准,从解决问题类型、应对风险类型、应用知识类型和能力类型共四方面,提出中国工程教育认证标准的本科生毕业要求的修改建议。

The undergraduate graduation requirements of various undergraduate engineering programs play the key role of connectingtraining purpose and curricula in the accreditation of such programs. Formulated in 2015, the accreditation criteria of the ChinaEngineering Education Accreditation Association (CEEAA) , are mainly based on the 2013 version of the Washington Accord(WA),which was significantly revised in 2021. The Undergraduate Program Outcomes developed by the European Engineering EducationAccreditation Network (ENAEE) are also advantageous. The revision of undergraduate graduation requirements for the CEEAA areproposed from four perspectives of specific types of problem solution, risk response, knowledge application, and capability, through arespective comparison between the new and old edition of the undergraduate program outcomes of ENAEE, the undergraduateattributes of WA, and the undergraduate graduation requirements of CEEAA, and through a comparison between the new edition ofundergraduate program outcomes of ENAEE and the new edition of undergraduate attributes of WA.