College of Science, Xi’ an University of Science & Technology

采用熵权TOPSIS方法建立了包含人才培养、科学研究、社会服务等相关指标的高校教师多准则绩效评价模型,对比了原积分排名与TOPSIS模型、熵权TOPSIS模型的绩效评价结果,讨论了评价指标变化及样本变化对指标间权重分布及评价结果的影响。发现熵权TOPSIS模型中内部差异化大的指标具有高权重,并使在内部差异化大的指标中表现突出的教师排名提升,评价结果明显区别于积分排序。评价指标的增减不影响原评价指标的权重排序,但指标权重增大或者减小的量与其原来权重的排序成正比。评价对象数量的增减将改变评价指标权重,并对评价结果排序产生影响。结果表明:通过建立分类考核与评价机制,平衡导向性和多元性的指标体系,选取科学合理的业绩量化标准,熵权TOPSIS方法可以客观、综合地评价教师取得的成果。

A multi-criteria performance evaluation model for college teachers, which include talents training, scientific research, social service and other related evaluation indexes, was established by a- dopting entropy weight TOPSIS method. The teachers’ performance under the original score ranking method, TOPSIS model and entropy-weighted TOPSIS model was evaluated, the effects of evaluation in- dex and sample change on the evaluation index weights and the evaluation results were also discussed. It is found that the evaluation index with large internal differences have high weights in the entropy- weighted TOPSIS model, which will improve the ranking of teachers with outstanding performance in these indexes, and lead to the obviously different evaluation results with score ranking. The adding or dropping one of the evaluation indexes does not affect the weight ranking of the original evaluation in- dexes, but the increase or decrease of the indexes’ weights are proportional to the original weight rank- ing. The adding or dropping of the evaluation objects will change the weight of the evaluation indexes and influence the evaluation results. The results indicate that the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method can evaluate the teachers’ achievements objectively and comprehensively by combining a classification as- sessment and evaluation mechanism, an orientation and pluralism balanced index system, and a scientif- ic and reasonable quantitative standards.

陕西省重点研发计划(2023-YBGY-335)