School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan)

为了探索如何构建多元主体共同参与的碳中和治理体系,收集多源数据形成我国碳中和话语库,基于话语联盟视角分析碳中和政策话语,采用话语网络分析和指数随机图模型方法,探究多元主体参与碳中和政策话语特征,识别不同主体交互所形成的话语共识和分歧,并明晰碳中和话语网络的形成机制,为干预和引导碳中和政策话语提供指导建议。研究发现:①碳中和政策关键主体对大多数政策话语概念保持一致态度,并大多集中在目标类话语概念,但在发展非化石能源、碳交易市场和发展氢能方面存在分歧;②碳中和话语网络涌现出公众、地方政府、五元主体3类话语联盟,并呈现“公众呼吁-地方规范”“五元引领-公众补充”和“地方阐释-五元吸纳”3种互动模式;③碳中和政策话语网络的形成机制中,碳中和参与主体类型和权力属性以及主体间关联结构特征是碳中和政策话语网络形成的影响因素,并且主体类型影响大于权力属性的影响;④公众主体对发展氢能、碳中和必要性和新能源汽车使用存在分歧,不同类型企业主体对碳中和发展尚未达成普遍话语共识。对此,政府应该重点关注公众、企业同类主体间的政策话语,在充分利用同类主体间话语影响力的同时,辅助权力手段,对多元主体的碳中和政策话语进行干预和引导,从而进一步完善多元主体参与碳中和治理体系并加快碳中和进程。

In order to explore how to construct a carbon neutrality governance system that involves multiple actors and provides guidancefor policy making decision, this study analyzes the discourses of carbon neutrality policies from the perspective of discourse alliance. Wefirst establish a carbon neutrality discourse corpus in China based on collecting data from various sources. Then, this study investigates thediscourse characteristics of diverse actors and clarifies the formation mechanism of the carbon neutrality discourse network, using discoursenetwork analysis and exponential random graph model respectively. The research findings are as follows: ① Key actors in carbon neutralitypolicies generally maintain a consistent attitude towards most policy discourse concepts, especially those target-related concepts, while holdcontroversial views on concepts about non - fossil energy development, carbon trading markets and hydrogen energy. ② The carbonneutrality discourse network forms three types of discourse alliances: the public, local governments, and the other five actors, exhibitingthree interaction patterns: “public appealing-local governments regulation”, “the other five actors leading-public supplementation” and“local governments interpretation-the other five actors incorporation” . ③ There are three main factors that shape the carbon neutralitypolicy discourse network, the types and power attributes of actors and the structural characteristics of actors’ interrelationships, of whichthe types of actors is the most critical. ④ The public hold differing opinions on the concept of development of hydrogen energy, thenecessity of carbon neutrality, and the use of new energy vehicles, while different types of enterprise actors have not reached a widespreaddiscourse consensus on carbon neutrality.Therefore, the government should focus on the policy discourses among the public andenterprises. While fully utilizing the influence of discourse amongsame type of actors, it should employ auxiliary means of power tointervene and guide the carbon neutrality policy discourse ofmultiple actors, thereby further improving the participation ofmultiple actors in the carbon neutrality governance system andaccelerating the carbon neutrality process.

国家自然科学基金资助项目(72293572)