摘要
本文基于工程生态理论和基本特征,运用工程生态新思维方式对交通进行再认识,形成了交通是多元异质要素构成的开放系统,是自主性和建构性的统一、自组织和他组织的统一,是多网融合的立体网络,具有竞争、合作、共生共存关系,具有不断演化、要素互动特征,交通网络越多元越具韧性,枢纽占有重要生态位等交通生态新认识,并从交通生态的宏观、中观、微观三个层次,分别提出了交通与国家和经济的关系、交通与地域和跨界融合,交通工程全生命周期、交通工具、个人行为等方面的新认识,为新时期交通高质量发展提供工程生态新思维。
Abstract
China is now in a new era of building a great modern socialist country and a great transport country. The transportationindustry is experiencing advancements in the interconnectivity of networks, the digital revolution, the widespread use of new energy,the integration of related projects, and the emergence of intelligent robots. Modern highways are no longer just “bare roads” of thepast, and the highway system is undergoing reshaping through the use of new technologies. The transportation infrastructure networkhas evolved to become a complex interweaving of information, power, and service networks, resulting in a new transportation formand business model. This optimization of road network resources helps to reduce congestion and improve transportation efficiencyand quality, forming a mechanism of increasing returns through “network effects”. Therefore, it is crucial to observe the new situationregarding traffic engineering with a fresh, innovative perspective, learning from naturally ecological model when studying realengineering.This paper employs the ecological thinking approach to re-examine traffic and gain new insights. Viewing traffic engineering as anopen system consisting of various heterogeneous units, it presents a blend of certainty and randomness in terms of its essence andboundaries. Traffic engineering embodies the unity of autonomy and constructivism, as well as self-organization and externalorganization. It is a multidimensional network integration that brings forth unprecedented new functionalities. Traffic engineeringactivities exhibit competition, cooperation, and symbiosis, and the constantly evolving elements facilitate continuous evolution andinteraction. Greater diversity in the transportation network enhances its resilience, while transportation hubs occupy significantecological niches. Additionally, traffic engineering is self-adjusting and possesses self-repair functions. The paper also sheds light onthe hierarchy of engineering ecology, which is analogous to the hierarchical structure of natural lives. Specifically, traffic ecology isexamined at macro, meso, and micro levels. At the macro level, it explores the relationship between traffic engineering and nationalurban planning, climate, economy, policies, laws, regulations, and standards. At the meso-level, it assesses the link between trafficengineering and regions, cross-border traffic engineering integration, and the interaction between traffic and industry. Finally, at themicro-level, it suggests deeper research into the entire life cycle of traffic engineering projects, intensified research on transportationvehicles within the scope of the Internet, greater attention to individual behavior in traffic engineering, and training of cross-borderprofessionals. It is essential to highlight that although engineering ecology is rooted in natural ecology, they significantly differ, withnatural ecosystem representing “natural processes”, while transportation ecosystems reflect human agency’s role. Consequently,compared to natural ecosystems, traffic ecosystems are more innovative, while stability is more dominant in natural ecosystems.