• 论文
主办单位:煤炭科学研究总院有限公司、中国煤炭学会学术期刊工作委员会
TPS与TBS分选粗煤泥对比研究
  • Title

    Comparison of performance of TPS and TBS in separation of coarse coal slime

  • 作者

    张丽明段福山谢广元郜伟强苏东然倪超符向东

  • Author

    ZHANG Liming;DUAN Fushan;XIE Guangyuan;GAO Weiqiang;SU Dongran;NI Chao;FU Xiangdong

  • 单位

    山西汾河焦煤股份有限公司回坡底煤矿洗煤厂山西焦煤霍州煤电集团有限责任公司中国矿业大学 化工学院邢台市金石科技开发有限公司

  • Organization
    Huipodi Mine Coal Preparation Plant, Shanxi Fenhe Coking Coal Co. Ltd.
    Shanxi Coking Coal Huozhou Coal Electricity Group Co. Ltd.
    School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, China University of Mining and Technology
    Xingtai Jinshi Technology Development Co. Ltd.
  • 摘要

    粗煤泥分选是选煤过程中的重要环节,传统的粗煤泥分选设备对难选粗煤泥难以实现有效分选,因此选煤厂通常采用两段分选来满足产品要求,但两段分选工艺比一段分选工艺复杂。为简化粗煤泥分选工艺流程,以TPS和TBS在回坡底矿选煤厂的工业应用为例,对比了两种设备在自身结构、产品结构和分选效果上的差异。在设备结构上,TPS通过在分选桶内增加一个内桶实现了两段分选,并通过顶水分配装置和内桶溢流导流槽等结构优化保证了两段分选的可靠性。在产品结构上,TBS可分选出精煤和矸石两种产品,但无法同时获得合格精煤和高灰分尾煤;TPS不仅可获得精煤、中煤、矸石三种产品,而且可根据产品质量要求灵活调节出两产品或三产品,在精煤产品灰分合格的前提下TPS尾煤灰分为72.21%,同时可得到产率为36.62%、灰分为35.72%的中煤产品。在分选效果上,TPS的数量效率比TBS高2.82个百分点,可燃体回收率比TBS高24.53个百分点。TPS与TBS分选粗煤泥的对比研究可为TPS与TBS的合理选型提供有益参考。

  • Abstract

    Separation of coarse slime is a key link in coal cleaning process, but it it difficult to have the slime effectively separated with use of conventional equipment. Such being the case, the coal preparation plants usually resort to the use of a two-stage separation process to produce the product with a quality as required. However, the two-stage process is a much more complicated process as compared with the single-stage process. With an aim to simplify the coarse slime separation process, the 3-product interference-bed separator (TPS) and the teetered-bed separator (TBS) in industrial application at Huipodi Mine Coal Preparation Plant are taken to serve as an example to explore the differences of the two separators in structural design, product structure and separation performance. Structurally, TPS has an outer and an inner cylinders for realizing the 2-stage separation process, and the reliability of the separation is ensured through its upward water distribution mechanism and the inner cylinder′s overflow diversion channel. In terms of product structure, TBS can produce only two products, namely, clean coal and refuse, and it is impossible for it to simultaneously produce up-to-standard clean coal and high-ash refuse products. Contrarily, with the use of TPS, three products (clean coal, middling and refuse) can be produced, and it can be turned into a two-product separator through flexible adjustment according to the required quality of products. While ensuring the required ash of clean coal product, TBS can produce a refuse product with an ash as high as 72.21% and a middling product with an ash of 35.72% and a yield of 36.62%. As viewed from the separation performance, the organic efficiency and recovery of combustible matter of TBS are 2.82 and 24.53 percentage points higher than those of TBS, respectively. The comparative study of TPS and TBS made in the paper may serve as a valuable reference for the optimum selection of the use of TPS and TBS.

  • 关键词

    粗煤泥分选TPSTBS设备结构产品结构分选效果数量效率可燃体回收率

  • KeyWords

    coarse slime separation;TPS;TBS;structural design;product structure;separation performance;organic efficiency;recovery of combustible matter

  • 文章目录
    1 设备结构对比
    2 产品结构对比
    3 分选效果对比
    4 结论
  • DOI
  • 引用格式
    张丽明,段福山,谢广元,等. TPS与TBS分选粗煤泥对比研究[J]. 选煤技术,2024,52(2):47−53. DOI: 10.16447/j.cnki.cpt.2024.02.007
  • Citation
    ZHANG Liming, DUAN Fushan, XIE Guangyuan, et al. Comparison of performance of TPS and TBS in separation of coarse coal slime[J]. Coal Preparation Technology,2024,52(2):47−53. DOI: 10.16447/j.cnki.cpt.2024.02.007
  • 相关文章
  • 图表
    •  
    •  
    • TPS及TBS结构示意图

    图(4) / 表(5)

相关问题

主办单位:煤炭科学研究总院有限公司 中国煤炭学会学术期刊工作委员会

©版权所有2015 煤炭科学研究总院有限公司 地址:北京市朝阳区和平里青年沟东路煤炭大厦 邮编:100013
京ICP备05086979号-16  技术支持:云智互联